Category: Uncategorized

Why It’s Time To Dump George Barna!

How many more surveys do we need that lack the clarity and veracity of a legitimate statistical study.  Here is today’s headline from George Baran, director of research at Arizona Christian University.

Generational Worldview Shift: Millennials Seek World without God, Bible, Churches

#1) These so-called studies are about prominence and money.  The proof is found in that when you finally “click down several levels” as you seek to find the support for such studies; you are directed to . . . .

“American Worldview Inventory 2021 — Annual Report” by George Barna

AND . . . . for a Donation of $13.00, you can obtain a copy of the so-called report — rather pricey!  You don’t even want to know how few pages you get for that price!

One could simply provide a link to the pdf for those who would like to first assess what is in the “book” before purchase or a “donation.”  Some indeed may well like a hard copy for themselves or others — Note: “Two copies for $25.00” — save $1.00.

P.S. “A Donation” is a nice way to get around charging and paying taxes and income reporting.

To those who argue  . . . “The research team should get paid for their “work,” I would respond — then it is not a donation, is it!  Like many college and university “professors,” it is what they do and want to do as academics in their field of endeavor.

. . . . . 

#2) There is little to no support provided.  If there is support and/or a legitimate explanation of how the study was conducted, I can’t find it.  “Click” — “Click” — “Click”  . . . . . . When clicking on the various links, you will find that most are out of date [“No results found.” / “Article no longer exists.”] or you are never provided with the information suggested by the link.  There is no study you can refer back to for understanding how the “study” was conducted or how the results were obtained.

. . . . . 

#3) Most studies reveal what is rather conspicuous.  It is rather obvious that culture and society are moving and will continue to move away from Christian truths and principles.  Remember — “Broad is the way.. . . and few there be that find it” . . . . “and in the last days scoffers . . . ”

Who is surprised that — “Extremely Low Percentage of Americans Hold Biblical Worldview: An Interview with George Barna.”  We need research to figure this trend out?

. . . . . 

#4) It is part of a credibility issue.  It is little wonder that the world looks at believers with skepticism.  If what Christians believe and teach as truth is subject to the same intellectual honesty as these kinds of studies, it is time to just walk away!

. . . . . 

It’s time to walk away from George Barna and associates!

Such “research” is just fodder for articles & post titles, the writing, and selling of books,
and the pockets of individuals and universities!

Six Reagents

Reagents:

A reagent is a substance that is added to another substance that is being tested. The reagent is looking to triggering a reaction. That reaction reveals something about the substance being tested. A reagent aims to produce a reaction, usually visualized by a change in color on a test strip. Reagents are used to determine blood glucose, ketones, pregnancy, chlorine, and now the well-known COVID-19 virus.

Here are six reagents
— six detectors —
that may well reveal who is leading your local church.

#1 — No one is as close to God as them:  In the Lord’s day, the attitude among the religious leaders was that no one was as close to God as they were.  They were the standard of godliness.  “The average Joe or Mary” could never be as holy as they were in God’s eyes.  However, as the Lord called attention to, it was the widow who put in her mite that was far more loving and sacrificial than the religious leaders of her day.

#2 — Do as I say,  not do as I do:  It was not that what the religious leaders said was wrong, it was that they did not do what they said to do — “All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.”

#3 – Burden Add-ers: The religious leaders added weight to men’s spiritual souls and backs.  After listening to the religious leaders teach & preach, the weight only felt greater.  What a contrast to the words of Jesus — “Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden,” and I will give you rest for your souls.  [1]

#5 – Money, not people: Biblically, money was always a good test of one’s godliness.  How did one get their money? How did they feel about their money? And how did they spend their money? One of the first reactions to the Covid crisis among far too many local churches was “the money” — “Here is how you can continue to give while not being able to attend church!” — As if they didn’t know and understand.  I dare say that few pastors lost a paycheck, but some of God’s people did — some without any regard. [2]

#6 – Served rather than serving: It was really all about them, not God’s people.  The religious leaders of the day were about being served.  They were at the forefront and sitting in the chief seats.  They watched others working.  They were above such activity themselves! That is why Jesus had to repeatedly correct the thinking of His disciples about greatness — The greatest among you are those who serve.



1. One of the reasons that Dana Ortland’s book [Gentle and Lowly: The Heart of Christ for Sinners and Sufferers] has had such remarkable success and readership is because it strikes a chord that is sorely missing today — The Lord’s Heart For His People.  It will probably be the book of the year among Christian readers!

2. With some, it is still about the money.  For some local churches, whether God’s people come back to church is only a money issue.  The proof will be in whether those who have little to offer financially are dismissively ignored or marginalized, as in the Lord’s day.

Another Urban Legend Of The Church Waiting To Be Unmasked

As stated, there seems to be no end to so-called studies, reports, and Barna Group statistics about churches, attendance, defection factors, youth/millennial church attendance, causes of failure and success, et al.

“Statistics don’t lie; people do.” 

In the Christian community where “truth” is rightfully valued, what passes for truth too often becomes a reason for the loss of credibility in society.  Some of the causes are . . . .

  • gullibility
  • naivete
  • wanting something to be true
  • a willing disregard of information
  • a lack of critical thinking
  • sales promotion (books & conferences)
  • the same sinful / worldly motivations of society in general

“The Barna Group” is one other most prolific spreaders of such disinformation.  If “The Barna Group” reports that this-or-that trend is taking place, then that is part of the repeated mantra across various platforms.

“The Barna poll last week reported that those who identify as Christians . . . .
Recent data indicates that . . . “

Again, that does not mean that those who cite statistical studies aim to lie; it just means that statistics and such scientific studies and polling are fraught with erroneous statements!  My minor for my Ph.D. was “Statistics,” as is the case for many other Ph.D. candidates because many Ph. D. dissertations are empirical studies.  Let me assure you that statistical studies and polling are rampant with abuse and misuse, even in the best of circumstances.

The results of any study or poll all depend on  . . . .

  • who you poll or use for the subjects of the study
  • the way questions are phrased
  • the bias of those conducting the study
  • how the variables were controlled
  • what variable could not be controlled
  • if there was a control group 
  • whether there was any peer review
  • and/or how the study was conducted.

We all know that, and we know it all too well after the national elections and the “science” that continues to support the Covid crisis!  After 2020 — it is shocking that anyone believes in the kind of studies, reports, polls, and so-called  “research” that groups like Barna produce!  But far too many do.

Many “statistical truths” are counter-intuitive!  They fly in the face of reason and/or common sense.  They ought to be questioned from the get-go!  However, when one attempts to do that, too often, there is no supporting data or study one can examine to determine how such a conclusion was reached. 

“When Christians were asked whether or not they . . . . ” 

What do you mean by the word ‘Christians’?”

√ I don’t believe for a moment that the rate of divorce among Christians is as high or higher than those who make no profession of faith in Christ. [1]. And no surprise, there are no studies that support that assertion!

√ I don’t believe for a moment that people decided whether they are going to revisit a church after the first 10 minutes of walking into the church. [2]. And no surprise, there are no studies that support that assertion!

AND

√ I don’t believe for a moment that young people have been attracted to the church by contemporary Christain music.

♦  Would someone please show me the increased attendance of “millennials” (or this-or-that “generation __”)!

Where is the support that the contemporary music used by the church has made any difference in who or how many now worship the Lord.  If that were true, at least you could find some solace and consolation for such a dramatic change in church music!

You can’t report that attendance among “millennials”  is down, while at the same time claim that contemporary music attracts the same demographic.  Which is it?

If there is any argument being made, it is that millennials and the younger generation are moving toward more liturgical forms of worship! [3]

♦  It is counter-intuitive that those who are 55 and older prefer contemporary music to the hymns of the faith — that they would rather watch the performance of singers & lights on stage than engage in “all-church-‘cliff barrows leading’-congregational singing” of great hymns.

 

You sure can’t claim that the change to contemporary music in the church is what this age group wants, and/or that it encourages congregational participation — not by experience!  Just look around!

. . . . . 

Let’s do the study! 

It is time for some solid support for what has been so life-changing in the local church — and so divisive!   Where is the proof that this seismic change in church life has made a difference in outreach, attendance, evangelism, edification, spiritual fulfillment, and worship?

Where is the proof!

. . . . . . 

I say . . . 
“The emperor has no clothes!”

It is another urban legend waiting to be unmasked as untrue!

 

 



1. I am sure that there are those who profess to be a Christian and who are just as likely to end up with a failed marriage as those in the world since we are all part of the same cultural and social test group.

2. I am sure that some people make a decision in 10 minutes after entering a church, and that some people are faced with this-or-that situation upon arriving, and it turns them off from the start.

3. These links are only a FEW of the many and varied articles — they are anecdotal, and time will tell whether there will be studies catch up to the conclusions of the antedotal.

 

 

And Other Urban Legends Of The Church

There seems to be no end to so-called studies, reports, and Barna Group statistics about churches, attendance, defection factors, youth/millennial church attendance, causes of failure and success —  ad nauseam

As it is has been often said. . . 
“Statistics don’t lie, but liars use statistics.” 

That does not mean that those who cite statistical studies are aiming to lie; it just means that statistics and such scientific studies and polling is fraught with erroneous statements because it all depends on who you poll or study, the way the questions are phrased, and/or how the study was conducted.

For years! — the statement was made (and believed) that the Christian community experiences a rate of divorce higher than those who know not Christ.  Such a statement was illogical since the Christian community was a subset of society, and that could only be true if there was a variable that could account for such a discrepancy.  Finally, the irrationality of such a statement was proven. Yes, it was total “nonsense” [1] ( as I argued in February 2020)!

Likewise, many other such “statistical truths” are either illogical or counter-intuitive — or both!  One of the most bandied about within church leadership conferences and circles is  — “A first-time visitor will make up his/her mind about returning to that church within the first ten minutes of the church service.”

Again, another “urban church legend” that is anti-intuitive and has no credible studies supporting it.
In fact, there are no studies, no less credible studies, that support such an assertion! 

Here is one of many such “studies,” followed by a list of others who have also pushed this so-deemed “truth of visitor attendance.”  You can check out the many places this claim appears, and you will discover that they all cite each other.  It is one big circle of credibility.  I have yet to find the source of any so-called study which supports such a statement (no less a synopsis of the details of such a study so that its procedures can be examined — which is typically called “a peer review.”)!

“How To Lose A First Time Guest In 10 Minutes Of Less.”

In tracing through the numerous articles repeating this urban legend, the origination of this “urban truth” seems to be “Greg Atkinson” . . .

We all know a guest makes up their mind whether or not they will return in the first 10 minutes.”

That is the only “support” that I have found — a declaration by Atkinson!

Atkinson’s assertion may have originated from comments found in some of his cited sources. . . . .

  • in the book — “Raving Fans: A Revolutionary Approach To Customer Service”
  • in the article in Psychology Today — “The Once-Over” — Can you trust first impressions? Initial encounters are emotionally concentrated events that can sometimes overwhelm us—but they often contain important elements of the truth.
  • in the book — “Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious by Timothy D. Wilson 
     

However, after searching and reading from his sources, I can’t find any statement that even comes close to supporting such an assertion. If such an assertion had any credibility, it should be and would be simply footnoted in an article or in Atkinson’s self-published book.

I  would suggest that it is merely another Urban Church Legend with no foundation, as is much of the Barna Group Research.  Too often, such “statistical studies” and “church polling” are often used to sell ideas, books and promote leadership conferences.

Next time you read these kinds of assertions about teens, millennials, growth, attendance, attitudes & beliefs, small groups, witnessing, or ministry — look for the sourcing and see if there is real support for such a comment — after all . . . God’s people are called to be “truth-tellers.”

. . . . .

Let me suggest another urban church legend about the value and congregational preference of “small groups,”[3] that on the face of it is counter-intuitive. . . .

. . . . .



1. Christian Divorce Rate — It is total Nonsense!

https://www.christianitytoday.com/edstetzer/2012/september/pastors-that-divorce-rate-stat-you-quoted-was-probably.html

2. There are “endless” articles with no support cited for the assertion

3. When I speak of “small-groups, “I am not speaking about “Sunday School,” discipleship classes, personal discipleship sessions, or Adult Bible Study classes (and the like) which may be labeled “small groups.”  I am speaking about “small-groups” that are marked by a broad range of qualified and unqualified Bible teachers, that typically encourage and promote personal transparency and the open sharing of spiritual failure, and/or that seek the input of attendees who have not even examined the biblical passage under discussion.

Only the Lord can handle everything about us — known and unknown to others who see us from the outside.  There are thoughts, decisions, actions, past failures, and present thought lives that, when shared, make it more difficult for others to maintain a relationship with others.  While there are those who “want to” bare their soul to whoever will listen (Facebook proves that point all too well), it is counter-intuitive to maintain the position that this kind of “small-group” approach in the local church edifies the church and its corporate relationships.

One of the reasons that “mid-week-prayer-services” are so poorly attended is because people do not enjoy publicly praying and often find themselves forced to do so no matter how bad their day has been or how rocky their personal spiritual life is at the moment.

I’m Tired!

“HOW I RECOVERED FROM BURNOUT:
12 KEYS TO GETTING BACK” [1]

I am so tired of these kinds of headlines and 12 step suggestions to overcome pastoral fatigue!  It is one of many such articles.  The responses to these articles are even more disquieting — ministry leaders, workers, and pastors who add the harmony to the sad song of difficulty and despair.

Ministry leaders and pastors highlight their personal battles in the ministry with all of its unrelenting demands, not to mention how their load has been terribly heightened by the 2020 pandemic.  Worse yet, 2020 is bleeding into 2021 — Oh, deary-deary me!

Such ministry leaders and pastors reveal that their knowledge of the Word is as inadequate in addressing life and living, as it is too often for those who sit in their pews — and there is a connection between the two.  A message which can’t be found in the Scriptures, to address the heart and mind of the preacher, will never be heard in the pulpit.  Sadly, in far too many cases, the Shepherd is as sick as the sheep!  The articles, posts, and responses prove that reality!

There is a woeful lack of perspective as well. 

  • We live in America, not a third-world county, or worse!
  • There is food on our tables!  We are not scavenging garbage pits to stay alive.  Truth is, overweight is the problem in America!
  • Ministry leaders and pastors work over 40 hours a week, more like 60 hours — LIKE MOST PEOPLE who work in the professional world!
  • Ministry leaders and pastors work in a great environment!  If not, then change it because the culture around your ministry is the culture you built, and it reflects you!
  • Most all have received their weekly check, without any disruption resulting from C-19.  Can’t say about some of those outside the ministry!
  • Most all of God’s people want to support their leaders and pastors.  Fact is, many ministry problems are self-inflicted.
  • You don’t want to be around for the Tribulation!  Some should be pre-tribulation if only for that reason -TIC (tongue in cheek).
  • Some believers around the world are going to sleep right now and are not sure they will be alive tomorrow morning or if their loved ones will be accosted or worse!

“Burnout” is what happens when living for and in the world — not what describes ought to describe the ministry.  That’s what happens when you move away from singing . . .

  • There Is Joy In Serving Jesus
  • It Is Well With My Soul
  • On Christ The Solid Rock I Stand
  • Onward Christian Soldiers
  • Am I A Soldier Of The Cross
  • And Can It Be

. . . You lose perspective when music begins to revolve around the sinner’s and saint’s experiences.

These articles, which seemingly continue to pop up over and over, are self-defeating, as are the appeals of pastors who call on God’s people to sympathize with their pain.  They not only don’t inspire confidence, but such self-serving invitations for sympathy actually cause people to walk away.  Such appeals reveal the weakness of the ministry leaders and/or pastors, which attracts few fellow soldiers. You inspire and command no soldier’s commitment!

There was a reason that David inspired 600 fighting men, and the reason wasn’t — “Woe is me — do you feel my pain — please come help me at the cave of Adullam — not that I need your affirmation, you understand.”

♦♦♦♦♦

JEREMIAH 12:5
If thou hast run with the footmen, and they have wearied thee,
then how canst thou contend with horses?
and if in the land of peace, wherein thou trustedst, they wearied thee,
then how wilt thou do in the swelling of Jordan?
♦♦♦♦♦

When the doctor is in bed alongside the patients,
and the patients are called upon to minister to the doctor
— don’t walk, run! — 

♦♦♦♦♦

The task of the Shepherd is to shepherd his sheep . . . . 

Ministry is not the sheep carrying the shepherd . . . .

 

♦♦♦♦♦

. . . . . .

If the Word cannot protect one from ministry-pastoral “burnout,”
then don’t preach about its power to others!



1. One of many such articles and posts

Address Or Dismiss!

First Baptist Church of Fort Lauderdale implodes over challenge to pastor’s iron rule

How does any baptist church that purports to operate under congregational rule (or not!) unilaterally dismiss members without . . . .

√  a properly called congregational meeting of the church membership

√  a congregational vote on each and every member

√  the majority vote of the membership present and voting

√  a genuine opportunity for those “dissident” members to address the congregation before any such vote

“On Friday night First Baptist trustees, seemingly under the control of Lead Pastor James Welch, released an email that expelled from membership —  much like Catholic excommunication —  an entire dissident faction, an estimated 200 churchgoers.

The group has been pressing for dialog about finances, the future of the property-rich institution and Welch’s controversial, top-down management style. He took control of the church in early 2019.

There could be no more dramatic example of that style than the trustees’ Friday night purge.”

The leadership explains their decision and actions in an email.  Their email (and the pastor’s in-person explanations concerning his actions) [1] argues that they have been biblical in their decision and actions.

The leadership uses such words as  . . .

  • patient
  • peacemaking
  • mediation
  • repentance
  • discipline
  • unfruitful
  • hope and pray
  • restoration
  • harmony
  • leadership
  • persevering for Christ
  • passion
  • biblical standards
  • etc

All good biblical words . . . . employed to explain and/or defend what was called a “Friday night purge” of 200 members!

Not sure that what was done by leadership is as biblical as they would like to publicly maintain and purport!

I often wonder how many people [2] have to express their discontent and/or leave (and in this case — be summarily removed from membership by the sole action of the very leadership being charged with wrong-doing) before the assessment is that there is really a problem — a leadership problem!

Are there really 200 members who don’t have legitimate concerns about the direction of the church?

Does the pastor, leadership, or ministry believe that there are not still others who also have misgivings the decisions and actions of those in charge?

Does the pastor, leadership, or ministry . . . .

√  believe that there are not those who are repulsed by the brusque dismissal of those members?

√  believe that they have effectively addressed the problem by the dismissal of those 200 members?  There are far more than those dismissed members who see and feel the same way.

√  believe that there are still those who have left in their hearts and minds; it is just time and circumstance that will lead to their leaving?

√  not believe that pastoral influence has been severely marred by a lost respect and sense of integrity?

√  not grasp that most realize that “congregational rule” has been set aside on the altar of expediency?

Too often, relationships control, loyalty to people over personal integrity is the pattern, power and authority go to the head, local churches take yet another step backward — for years if not decades.

Apparently, for some . . . 
It is easier to dismiss the people
than address legitimate problems!

. . . . . .

. . . . . . 



First Baptist Church of Fort Lauderdale implodes over challenge to pastor’s iron rule

Church’s statement of faith — “Each congregation operates under the Lordship of Christ through democratic processes. In such a congregation, each member is responsible and accountable to Christ as Lord.”

https://www.law.com/dailybusinessreview/2020/10/14/alleged-whistleblowers-suit-against-fort-lauderdale-church-raises-red-flag-for-nonprofits/?slreturn=20210403083012

https://www.christianpost.com/news/florida-church-members-vote-to-fire-pastor-but-board-disputes.html

https://www.change.org/p/all-church-members-vote-of-no-confidence-for-pastor-james-r-welch-first-baptist-church-of-fort-lauderdale-fl

Click to access Notice-to-Membership-Rev-11_6.pdf

1. Pastor Welch speaking on the church by-laws
https://vimeo.com/firstbaptistftl

Pastor Welch addressing the church conflict
https://vimeo.com/firstbaptistftl

Pastor Welch explaining “Best Practices.”
https://vimeo.com/firstbaptistftl

2. Or who has to leave before someone takes note that there is a clear problem with a church or ministry.

Six Ways To Correct A Mistake: Tongue In Cheek – “TIC”

. . . . . .

Ministry leaders and pastors make mistakes — of course, they do.  That is why you hear the words, “Only Jesus is perfect.”  It is not that administrators, missionaries, church officials, Christian school teachers, and yes, pastors do not make mistakes, but what do they do when and after?  That is the most telling question!

#1) Ignore it and hope that it goes away.  Say nothing and hope no one else says anything.  If someone does, quickly dismiss it and then pray that the comment-question is not felt or shared by many others.

#2) Double down and say it again.  This time, say it with even great conviction vocal energy.  Make the argument for doing or saying what was done and said!  The strategy: Anyone who would be so bold as to say or do something again must be convinced that it is the right thing to do.  Say it louder, stronger, and repeatedly!

#3) Hold Up The Balancing Scale:  Balance out what was said or done with the many things done right.  Bring up the many good and appropriate [1] aspects of your life and ministry . . . .

  • one’s years of faithfulness in marriage
  • one’s children, and their effectiveness in parenting
  • one’s extensive years in the ministry
  • the breadth of one’s ministry
  • the difficulties and demands that come with ministry
  • any successes in the past – lean on the past!
  • how hard you work — every day — and with little appreciation
  • et al.

Obviously, all these and other factors erase the need to address what was inappropriately, mistakenly, or wrongfully said or done.  Such appeals support the fact that there is no need to feel any remorse over what was said or done, no less any apology!  (TIC)

#4) Manipulate the record. That can be accomplished in several ways. One can rewrite what was said or done, or indicate that what you meant was “. . . . . . .”.  Sometimes you can “nuance” certain words and twist the obvious meaning of this-or-that word in a way that it is contended that you really did not say what you said.  A helpful sentence to tuck away is . . . . “Well, I did say/do that, but what I meant to say or do was . . . . .”  Nothing else need be done.  You did not intend it!  Thus, it is obvious to all that nothing else needs to be said or done!

#5) Remove the evidence: The last approach can be combined with the above or used severally.  If you said or did anything foolish, self-serving, inappropriate, embarrassing, bizarre, or reflected negatively on you personally — get rid of the evidence.

  • delete that email / text message / voice message
  • hide or destroy any document which calls into question your integrity
  • marginalize the worth of those who callup that what was said or done
  • (if you must) excommunicate those who direct attention to your words or actions
  • alter or delete any sermonic audio-video which paints that unflattering picture

If you need to destroy any evidence, make sure that any who questions it understands that it is not at all because you are dishonest or embarrassed.

#6) Claim Victimhood:  You are the victim, and you didn’t do anything wrong — at least not to a level as to where you would have to apologize or address it publicly.  Stir up public sympathy for how hard it is to be in ministry (Convince God’s people that your job is far more demanding than the many who work in the secular world and then also give of their time, talent, and treasure to serve in the church).

Remind God’s people of your sacrifice.  Tell them again about how you have been mistreated in ministry.  Dredge up past situations — again — for another run at simpatico.  These repeated situations which bubble up are examples of your victimization, not wrong-headedness, inappropriate words or actions, or your self-serving actions!

. . . . . . . 

If you decide to turn onto any of these roads, remember to . . . . .

  • repeat and maintain that you are a man/woman of integrity, honesty, and transparency
    The last thing you want to do is have these areas questioned.  That was the whole purpose of originally engaging in any one of these options.  Make sure people understand that you would never take any of these options for dishonest reasons or motives.  You are a person who stands and says what should and ought to be said and let the chips fall where they may! — End of Sentence, Period! Full Stop!
  • pre-think through any arguments that you can make if you are called on any of the above options.
    Some helpful choices:
    “We all could have been better at saying what we say.”
    “We need to be frank and honest and call a spade a spade.”
    “What I said was really for the members of the church to hear.”
  • continue to cultivate the support of others.  You will need others who will support and maintain that what you did or said was wise, honest, or justified — those who will work with you in doing any of the above five options.  Find and further encourage other people who will back your actions or words by various relational means.

. . . . . . . 

This is all said with “Tongue In Cheek,”
because no one would propose these approaches
with a straight face!

. . . . . .



1. “appropriate” in that it is expected of someone in the ministry.  Of course, you were a faithful spouse!  Did we expect otherwise?. . . . . . . 

P.S.  There is an appalling lack of self-awareness when it comes to ministry leaders!  At times, you want to say . . . .

“How can you say that — publicly — with a straight face!?”

November Update | My Crunchy Life

. . . . The answer is — a total lack of self-awareness!

While talking about integrity, honesty, transparency, and loving others, ministry leaders can violate those very principles by word and deed.  At times, it is that woeful lack of self-awareness that shocks God’s people as they listen to their leaders talk about integrity.

Self-awareness is a prerequisite to any genuine and honest sermonizing on the wrong-doing of others!
Claiming victim status reveals publicly shouts out a message of a woeful lack of personal self-awareness!

Before any of us get too self-righteous, we can all recall saying or doing something which should not have been said or done.  Most all of us have personally embarrassed ourselves with the words of our mouth or actions that speak just as loud.  Many of us have probably failed at the “when and after.”  Most all of us, who have lived any length of time, have walked on these roads, rather than just facing the truth ourselves, and/or admitting to others that we should never have said or done this-or-that.  That fact does not negate the TIC commentary. Rather, it highlights the continual need for us to be more self-aware, as well as direct and personal (sometimes public) in humbly addressing our inappropriate, self-serving, and/or wrongful words and actions.

You Would Think This Was Advice For Pastors — or — “For the sons of this world are more shrewd in their generation than the sons of light.”

Original Link

Fralic’s 7 Rules for Making Memorable Connections

‘Add value in conversations’ is typical advice. This means making sure people walk away with a new idea, referral, intro, etc. But Fralic has found imparting energy to be even more important than sharing new information. To do this, follow these seven rules:

1. Convey genuine appreciation. Actively project warmth and high energy. It’s been observed people like you when they feel liked by you. So, do you greet them in a way that sounds like you’re genuinely happy to see them? To make it clear you’re interested in the other person, think about what they know that you don’t. What do you actually want to learn in the interaction? Focus on that so that they can walk away knowing they added value too.

2. Listen with intent. The focus you bring to asking specific questions about what’s being said in real time makes others feel heard. This is a big one. Being a good listener is about two things: 1) Demonstrating that you’ve heard exactly what was said by the other person, and 2) encouraging them to continue. This breaks down into what’s called “backchanneling” — offering short, enthusiastic responses as the other person talks (i.e. “yeah” “mm-hmm” “totally” “I can see that”), and asking follow up questions that reference the information you were just given.

You’d be surprised how often people flub on listening, says Fralic. People’s minds wander, they’ll be nodding but thinking about what’s for dinner, they might look past the person speaking to see who else is in the room. All of this projects disinterest, a lack of value or prioritization for the person, and that can only hurt the relationship. If you’re talking on the phone, asking specific follow-ups becomes even more important with no body language or eye contact to read.

3. Use humility markers. What you say and how you say it can put others at ease and replace nerves with positive energy — even in tough situations. “I have relationships that have lasted over a decade that started with me meeting a founding team and not investing,” says Fralic. “I’ll often start that conversation saying, ‘I’m wrong all the time and I very well may be here.’” Acknowledging your own fallibility and human imperfection can go a long way toward making yourself relatable. Especially if there’s a power dynamic where someone is asking for your advice, attention or help, you want to put the other person at ease.

There’s an unspoken distinction in the networking world between the Hunters and the Hunted.

When Fralic reached out to Kevin Compton all those years ago. He was approaching one of the ‘hunted’ — someone who had 1,000 other things to be thinking about. But he still took the time to engage and it was never forgotten.

You don’t need to build yourself up any more or explain why you’re important or going to be helpful. Your focus should be on building bridges between your experience and theirs so there are points of recognition, especially if you can organically work in shared struggles or challenges.

Taking the time to call or meet in person also expresses humility — which is paramount if you’re about to reject someone. You want to emphasize that your time is no more important than theirs. “I like to call to explain opportunities I’ve passed on versus emailing. A rejection stands out among people’s interactions. When you take the time to be conscientious and human, people are often appreciative and will respect you more.”

4. Offer unvarnished honesty. There are a lot of reasons why people don’t share what they truly think in professional situations. They don’t want to tarnish relationships or endure an uncomfortable exchange or risk being disliked. Even if you’re one of the ‘Hunted,’ it’s human nature to avoid these experiences. You can differentiate yourself by being as honest as you can. Just remember to root your honesty in what will actually have utility for the other party. This will set a good tone for all future conversations.

5. Blue-sky brainstorm. Maybe you can’t provide what someone is looking for. But, if you can change the angle or way they’re thinking about something by openly brainstorming with them, you make them feel like they got something special and unexpected. It’s key that you’re brainstorming with them, not for them. So, in the example of passing on an investment, Fralic makes a point of listing others who might invest, or he spends time thinking through how they might pitch or message their business differently.

It’s best when the conversation builds on itself. He’ll suggest a few names or changes, and then provide a sounding board for any concerns or questions the founders might have. This way, he can help them find a new, albeit slightly different path forward, and that’s what they’ll remember — not just the no.

Give before thinking about what you get. Always offer something of value before expecting or asking for something in return. Key to this is not focusing on reciprocity.

“If you find yourself keeping score in your professional relationships, you’re on the wrong track.”

Instead make a list of everything you feel comfortable offering others (even if you get nothing back). Perhaps you provide connections or advice or office space or a next step in a process. That way, if you have to say no to one thing, there’s still energy you can contribute.

6. End every meeting or conversation with the feeling and optimism you’d like to have at the start of your next conversation with the person. “Assume you’re going to run into everyone again — it usually happens either by plan or happenstance,” says Fralic. “There are no closed connections. The world is too small.” When you do meet again, you want the person to think, ‘Oh great, it’s so-and-so!’ not ‘I guess I’ll get through this somehow.’ If you envision running into this person again and how you want that to go, it’ll undoubtedly influence how you navigate a present conversation — usually for the better.

For example, Fralic is always impressed by founders who — when turned down — send some variation of, “Thanks for looking even if it’s not a fit. If you have other ideas for us or if anything changes, please let me know,” or, “Chris, when we met, you had a question/issue about X. I just wanted to show you what we’ve done about it — no need to respond.” “A person who says that shows she’s savvy enough to not take bad news personally, or create obligation or awkwardness, or continue to argue their point after you’ve said no. I’ll remember her for it,” he says

There’s time beyond this fundraise and even this company. Relationships take years to build. Start now.

7. Don’t fake it till you make it. It may be common wisdom for finding confidence, but it has some negative byproducts. Namely, Fralic has seen it used to justify winging it in important meetings. Faking it in this context doesn’t mean bluffing your way through interactions that make you feel insecure or intimidated. That leads to bad decision making.

“I’ve seen people overstate their credentials because they were put on the spot, or blindly target every executive in a room because they figured they should,” he says. “This rarely leads to long-lasting relationships.” If you want to connect with someone professionally to move your goals forward, you need to know exactly why you care about that person or their company. And you need to know how to articulate it succinctly. Everyone seems to have a story about a cold call miraculously turning into a career-making breakthrough. This doesn’t happen by magic. It happens because your sincerity is clearly powered by diligent preparation.

The #1 Way For A Ministry To Avoid A Ministry Migraine

Recently, a friend of mine, who applied for a particular Christian ministry position, was asked what he would do in a situation involving wrong-doing within that institution.  Before he could respond, this comment was made . . . . “You do realize that we have to protect our ministry; its reputation is always on the line in these kinds of situations.”

Upon hearing that from her, I indicated that my response would have been . . . .

“The best way to protect your ministry and its reputation is to be open and transparent.  When you try to cover up what actually took place, the ministry and those in leadership find themselves in a mess!  Ask RZIM about how covering-up works out!”

Study the past year’s ministry and church scandals, and you will see a series of actions that appear over and over when real institutional wrong-doing is misaddressed.   Those in positions of leadership and power seek to divert attention away from what was actually done.

Midst wrong-doing, the temptation is to . . . . .

  • cover-up the wrong-doing
  • silence the “critics”
  • limit exposure to the facts of the situation
  • pull in others to vouch for your story
  • reposition people, who are or have been supportive, into roles of greater power/control
  • call-up the years of past ministry as a plausible argument against the possibility of misconduct today 
  • repeatedly claim victimhood
  • seek sympathy from those who know little-to-nothing as to what has actually happened [1] 
  • publicly create personal sympathy as one who has been unfairly “attacked” – from “Victimology 101”

The best way to protect a ministry from damage,
and to guard one’s personal reputation and integrity,
is to be transparent from the beginning. 

Various ministries and churches, that have faced serious problems, would tell you exactly that — NOW — after all the damage was done.

Various ministries and churches, that have faced serious problems, would tell you that because that was their greatest mistake as they sought to control the situation they created for themselves!

Most all ministries and churches would give you that advice long before they themselves were facing such a problem because this is not “hidden wisdom” that can only be learned after failing the transparency test.  Most all ministries and churches understand that UNTIL they themselves are clearly engaged in wrong-doing, made some terrible and even indefensible decisions, or were embarrassed about their words and/or actions. 

Then — ministries and leaders often begin using the word “transparency” . . . .

  • as a newly found badge, proving that they have integrity
  • to now bolster their claim that they are committed to honesty and oversight
  • after they have failed at being anything but transparent
  • after people have jumped-ship because serious questions have again remained unanswered

The best way to protect a ministry, a church, a pastor, deacons, an elder, or administrators, is to be transparent from the beginning, allow those who have a meaningful stake in the organization, ministry, or church to hear what actually happened.  Provide a sincere, genuine, and “as long as it rightfully takes” opportunity for God’s people to hear from those of different vantage and to ask any and all questions.

Fail at that, expect questions to linger, stories to be continually told-retold (accurate, inaccurate, most partially true), and the next problem to be worse than the previous one because of an eroding trust that will follow you issue after issue.

The best way to protect a ministry from damage,
and guard one’s personal reputation and integrity,
is to be transparent from the beginning & throughout

All understand that if you have nothing to hide, then you will be open, above-board, and straightforward; that you will be transparent as to what took place as well as to how it all transpired from the beginning.

 



1. They don’t know, primarily because they have been denied the opportunity to rightfully know.
The RZIM fiasco illustrates the results of that approach as men and women vouched for RaviZ’s integrity, only to be embarrassed, but not ashamed enough to resign from their positions of trust.

Note:  If you want to see how twisted it all gets . . . . 

There was little-to-no transparency while it was all taking place, but “now that this trust has been fundamentally compromised, [and] the situation demands transparency. . . . . “We believe that the most God-honoring approach is to pursue transparency.”

There was little love shown to those who were publicly manhandled by those in positions of power, but now let’s talk about “being loving.”  It’s hypocrisy or a dismal lack & level of self-awareness. 

There was little willingness to show grace, but now . . . . “We pray for God’s grace and mercy for all, and for restoration that brings peace, hope, forgiveness, and change where most needed.”

There was little willingness to get at the truth as to what was said and done, but now . . . . . “our prayer has been that the truth would be known.”

Church Ministry: How To Make The Problem Worse! — The Top 3 Ways!

Someone has suggested asking this question in a problem-solving situation . . . .

If you were going to make this problem worse, how would you do it? [1]

What a great brainstorming question to ask when facing any and all problems! As stated, it requires that we invert our thinking processes which then provides a valuable and totally different vantage on the problem.

There are ministries and local churches that would do well to ask that question when dealing with a difficult situation and problem! –” What could we do to make this worse?”

The answer to that question might highlight what you do not want to do — though easily tempted and maybe even contemplating!  During my years in teaching and pastoring, I have often thought and said that some pastors create their own problems and trials in ministry.  Then they call for a pity party and claim victimhood.

Let me list out some ways to make things worse, to heighten a self-created ministry or church problem . . . .

#1 — Make Decisions Without Seeking Desiring The Sincere & Genuine Input Of Others.

They are convinced that they know what is best, and that is what will happen at the end — Every man is right in his own eyes.  The problems come because “his own eyes” and not the way others see it.  There are other ways!  There are good, better, and best ways.  There are terrible ideas that are clothed with enough euphemistic and justifying garb that such terrible ideas survive in that ministry leader’s mind.

Some take final concession as agreement. Others may go along with what the ministry leader wants — in the end — but that does not mean that they are convinced. They have merely grown tired of pushing back when the end seems certain.  The end seems certain because there is little-to-no movement or adjustment.

Make decisions without the sincere and genuine input . . . .

    • sincere and genuine input that changes and revamps an idea
    • sincere and genuine input which moves from good to better or best
    • sincere and genuine, which seeks the input of those affected, or who might well be in opposition
    • sincere and genuine input which changes an idea or decision to where it may no longer even be desired by the ministry leader
    • sincere and genuine input that even leads to its abandonment because of all of its flaws and implications
    • sincere and genuine input, which reveals that it is not best for the ministry, but self-serving.

. . . . and then send out invitations to your pity party after criticism regarding some very bad decisions.

. . . . . . 

#2 — Make Ministry About You —  about your comfort, advantage, and privilege.

If a pastor does not believe that God’s people cannot recognize a self-serving spirit, they are woefully naive, or worse yet, indifferently ignorant.

    • make decisions that do not strengthen the ministry, but make your ministry easier
    • reflect an unawareness about the health of others, but highlight your health situations
    • focus on your financial income and benefits, with little honest, practical, or authentic concern about those making far less in that ministry
    • hire, position, or highlight family members in the work of that ministry
    • keep passing off ministry to others — visitation / preaching / special day events
    • promote nepotism in that ministry
    • stay away from any “hands-on” work — alongside others
    • make “salary /benefits” and “giving” a repeated ministry topic
    • talk about how hard you have had or have it in ministry

When several of these markers show up, God’s people see them!  They understand what is taking place.  They know who is the most important person in that ministry — and it isn’t them.

Make ministry about you, and then send out invitations to your pity party and claim victimhood when people catch on!

. . . . . . 

#3 — Mishandle & Manhandle God’s People — disregard, disrespect, and even abuse your power and position in ministry.

A quick way to lose ministry leadership is to make some damaging mistakes and follow through on some terrible “people-decisions.”  I have seen youth pastors who “have to leave” because of a damaging mistake that they will never be able to outlive in that ministry.  A child or teen was injured — while a mistake and not malicious in any way — but unrecoverable!

Likewise, some terrible “people-decisions” can cause so much damage when it comes to a youth pastor, a staff member, a missionary, a ministry volunteer, a church officer, or even a well-like and long-term drifter.

Those in ministry clearly know and understand that reality.  It is supported by the fact that those in ministry will seriously consider the implications of people-decisions.  Replacing a staff member, moving someone to another position, not hiring this-or-that person, asking someone to head up a ministry, not asking someone, or even firing for a good reason all have serious ministry implications.  Ministry leaders and pastors know that!

Church life is about relationships.  That is why some people stay in churches which are doctrinally askew — “Yea, I know that they believe and teach this-or-that, but . . . . . ” That is why some people join churches that are “not their cup of tea,” but they have some good friends there!

Instead of recognizing that the ministry is filled with good and great people, see any who honestly and/or legitimately disagree as the enemy; it is you against them!  If you want to make the problem worse, be true to form and categorize those who have honest and legitimate disagreements, as trouble-makers.

After repeating the go-to argument of “sowing discord,” send out invitations to your pity party and claim victimhood.

. . . . . . 



1. If you were going to make this problem worse, how would you do it?

“Here is a wonderful gotcha! question. It comes from Sunni Brown, author of Doodle Revolution. This question is delightfully mischievous. It requires us to invert our thinking and look at a situation from a completely new angle. The insights from this question reveal to us what we should do.”

2. An example of that is Dr. John MacArthur.  At times, it is not that what he often says is not technically correct, but he chooses to make statements that create controversy — i.e. Lordship salvation / the blood of Jesus / et al.  At other times, he opens up himself to warranted or unwarranted criticism — you decide.

3. In fact, some ministry leaders live with what they deem to be “difficult people situations” for that very reason — they cannot do what they would like to do without an “uproar.”  What they would like to do has meaningful ministry implications.  To make that move may be the last straw for some of God’s people, and they suspect that — and some do it anyway — go back to points #1 & #2.