If you read the same books that others are reading,
you will think the same thoughts that others are thinking!

One of the most recent and pervasive examples of that statement and of theological “group think” teaching is about today’s exhumed fad of . . .  Passive Sanctification (the link).

“The current debate about sanctification (does holiness come through personal effort, or is the best approach to sanctification to “relax” and trust God more?) is hardly limited to this age. J. C. Ryle fought the same battles over 100 years ago. Here are his comments on the idea that we are sanctified in the same way we are justified:

“I ask whether it is wise to speak of faith as the one thing needful, and the only thing required, as many seem to do nowadays in handling the doctrine of sanctification. Is it wise to proclaim in so bald, naked, and unqualified a way as many do that the holiness of converted people is by faith only, and not at all by personal exertion? Is it according to the proportion of God’s Word? I doubt it.

That faith in Christ is the root of all holiness; that the first step towards a holy life is to believe on Christ; that until we believe we have not a jot of holiness; that union with Christ by faith is the secret of both beginning to be holy and continuing holy; that the life that we live in the flesh, we must live by faith in the Son of God; that faith purifies the heart; that faith is the victory which overcomes the world; that by faith the elders obtained a good report—all these are truths which no well instructed Christian will ever think of denying. But surely the Scriptures teach us that in following holiness the true Christian needs personal exertion and work as well as faith. The very same apostle who says in one place, “the life that I live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God,’ says in another place, “I Fight,” “I run,” “I keep under my body”; and in other places, “let us cleanse ourselves,” “Let us labour,” “Let us lay aside every weight.”

Moreover, the Scriptures nowhere teach us that faith sanctifies us in the same sense and in the same manner that faith justifies us! Justifying faith is a grace that “worketh not,’ but simply trusts, rests, and leans on Christ (Rom 4:5). Sanctifying faith is a grace of which the very life is action: it worketh by love,” and, like a mainspring, moves the whole inward man” (Gal 5:6)…

Without controversy, in the matter of our justification before God, faith in Christ is the one thing needful. All that simply believe are justified. Righteousness is imputed “to him that worketh not but believeth” (Rom 4:5). It is thoroughly scriptural and right to say, “Faith alone justifies.” But it is not equally scriptural and right to say, “Faith alone sanctifies.” The saying requires very large qualification. Let one fact suffice. We are frequently told that a man is “justified by faith without the deeds of the law” by St. Paul. But not once are we told that we are “sanctified by faith without the deeds of the law.”

. . . . .

. . . . .

Sanctification is progressive!
It is not the Lord or me. 
It is the Lord and me.
It is “Both-And.”

. . . . .

Other Information & Links:

One of MANY links warning about the idea of passive sanctification
— https://headhearthand.org/blog/2015/10/21/five-attractions-of-passive-sanctification/

♦♦♦♦♦

Note: Men like John Piper confuse the issue further by playing games with the word “passively” — “You Can’t Passively Kill Sin.”  The article’s title makes it sound like he agrees that sanctification IS NOT passive, but he doesn’t! His “Calvinism” is part of what contributes to this twisting of the doctrine of sanctification. It is a highly nuanced article that clouds and confuses the issues even further.

If you would like to read John’s Piper’s position on Eternal Security, which is also just as nuanced, obscured, and twisted by his Calvinistic position, read this article, in Piper’s own words!

. . . . .